TL;DR
Get backup power and energy gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A bipartisan Senate permitting bill has drawn support from energy industry groups and former officials across several administrations, but the Trump administration’s renewed effort to revisit offshore wind permits has put negotiations under strain. The bill could shorten timelines for transmission and some clean energy projects, while also accelerating gas pipelines; a Senate vote is not expected until after the midterm elections.
The U.S. Justice Department has asked a court to let the federal government reconsider an offshore wind permit for New England Wind, intensifying a dispute that could derail a bipartisan Senate permitting bill aimed at speeding energy and grid construction amid opposition to offshore wind deals. The administration also wants to revisit permits for Revolution Wind and other projects, prompting a leading bill sponsor to warn that the moves could undermine negotiations.
The permitting legislation was introduced by a bipartisan group of senators three weeks before the report. A Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy tool estimates that a transmission project facing delays and permit challenges can take nearly 18 years to enter service. The report says the bill could cut as much as eight years from that timeline, in part by allowing federal regulators to issue permits when states do not act quickly enough.
The proposal would also put solar, wind and geothermal projects on a faster path, but it could speed up gas pipeline approvals as well, according to the Columbia analysis. That provision has drawn criticism from some tribal and environmental groups, who are calling for changes. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, has separately raised concerns that the bill could make it easier to build data centers.
Support has come from several energy industry groups. Advanced Energy United, the Solar Energy Industries Association and three other organizations sent congressional leaders a letter urging swift passage. Former officials from the Trump, Biden, Obama, Clinton and both Bush administrations also backed the legislation in a joint letter. But the administration’s offshore wind actions have complicated those efforts: on Tuesday, the Justice Department asked a court to allow a review of the New England Wind permit, for a planned 2-gigawatt project off Massachusetts.
Permitting Reform Meets Offshore Wind Disputes
The dispute puts two consequential questions in the same legislative negotiation: how quickly the country can build energy infrastructure, and whether federal approvals for offshore wind projects will remain in place. Shorter permitting timelines could help transmission and clean energy projects move forward sooner, while provisions affecting pipelines and data centers have also raised concerns among critics.
The administration’s effort to revisit permits matters to the bill’s prospects because the offshore wind projects are not a separate political issue for some lawmakers involved in negotiations. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat and bill sponsor, told Politico, “This is how you blow up a permitting deal.” That comment reflects his assessment of the political effect; it does not establish that the bill is dead. The report says a Senate vote is not expected until after the midterm elections, leaving time for negotiations but also for further conflict.
home energy monitor electricity usage
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Senate Proposal Would Change
The bill is intended to reduce delays in federal permitting for major energy and grid projects. One mechanism described in the Columbia analysis would allow federal regulators to grant permits when states fail to act within a timely period. The estimated savings of up to eight years apply to the report’s analysis of a delayed transmission project; they are not a guarantee that every project would be completed that much sooner.
The legislation has attracted a broad but not unanimous coalition. Energy industry groups and former officials from multiple administrations have called for passage, while tribal and environmental groups have sought revisions, particularly over pipeline approvals. The report also notes Khanna’s concerns about data center construction. Those disagreements leave lawmakers weighing faster project approvals against the impacts and types of infrastructure the bill could facilitate.
“This is how you blow up a permitting deal.”
— Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a bill sponsor, speaking to Politico
residential solar panel system with battery storage
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Permit Reviews and Votes Remain Open
The Justice Department has asked a court for permission to reconsider permits; the supplied report does not say that the court has granted the requests or that the permits have been revoked. It also does not provide a final decision on the New England Wind application, or specify the complete list of other offshore projects affected. Revolution Wind is already producing power, according to the report, but the potential consequences of a permit review for its operations are not detailed.
The administration reportedly offered a concession on Thursday morning: a White House official said the Defense Department would allow a handful of long-delayed onshore wind projects to proceed. The report does not name those projects or describe the terms of the decision. It remains unclear whether that step, or further concessions, will be enough to restore support for the permitting bill.
small wind turbine for home off-grid power
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Negotiations Before a Delayed Vote
The Senate is not scheduled to vote on the permitting bill until after the midterm elections. Before then, lawmakers and advocacy groups may seek changes to its provisions, while the administration’s permit review requests and any further decisions on wind projects could affect negotiations. Whitehouse described the reported onshore wind concession as “a start”, not a resolution.
The next indicators will be whether the administration makes additional commitments, whether senators revise the proposal in response to concerns about pipelines and other construction, and whether the groups backing the bill continue their calls for passage. No final agreement or vote date is established in the supplied report.
power grid transmission line and renewable energy educational model
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What prompted concern about the Senate permitting bill?
The Justice Department asked a court to let the federal government reconsider the New England Wind permit, and the administration is also seeking reviews of permits for Revolution Wind and other offshore projects. Bill sponsor Sheldon Whitehouse said the actions could undermine the deal.
What would the permitting bill do?
The bill aims to speed approvals for energy and grid projects. A Columbia University analysis says it could cut as much as eight years from the timeline for a delayed transmission project, partly by allowing federal regulators to act when states are slow to issue permits.
Would the bill benefit only clean energy?
No. The proposal could accelerate solar, wind and geothermal projects, but the Columbia analysis also says it could speed up gas pipeline approvals. That prospect has led some tribal and environmental groups to seek revisions.
When will the Senate vote?
The report says a Senate vote is not expected until after the midterm elections. A specific date and the outcome of negotiations have not been provided.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
