TL;DR
Get backup power and energy gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Eugene, Oregon, voters are scheduled to decide this November whether to create a climate fund financed by a 2% fee on qualifying large companies’ profits earned within the city. Supporters project $15 million to $37 million in annual revenue, while opponents say the fee could increase retail prices; the outcome and any final revenue remain unknown.
Eugene, Oregon, voters will decide this November whether to charge certain large companies a 2% fee on qualifying profits earned within the city and use the money for clean energy and climate projects. The proposal, which supporters estimate could raise $15 million to $37 million annually, would make Eugene the second U.S. city identified in the report to use a fee on billion-dollar corporations for a clean energy fund, after Portland.
The measure would apply to companies making at least $1 billion in gross profits nationally and at least $500,000 in gross profits within Eugene. The proposed fee is 2% of the qualifying profits made inside city limits. The initiative exempts profits from groceries, medicines, residential garbage and recycling, and healthcare services, according to the report.
If approved, the fund would support renewable energy and energy-efficiency programs, clean energy job training, and green infrastructure, including projects such as tree planting. The initiative would prioritize work benefiting low-income and historically marginalized communities. The projected annual revenue range comes from the proposal; the amount collected would depend on the measure’s implementation and the taxable activity of covered firms.
Supporters say the funding could help residents and businesses pay for energy upgrades they cannot otherwise afford. Amy Winton, who runs Mexican taquería Pandita in Eugene, said the restaurant relies on gas equipment that came with its space because it lacks the funds to switch to electric appliances. The proposal could help pay for similar retrofits, though the report does not establish that Winton’s restaurant would receive funding.
How Eugene’s Fund Could Be Used
The vote concerns both a new local revenue source and who pays for climate investments. If passed, the fee would direct money from a defined group of large companies toward building upgrades, workforce training and community infrastructure. For households and small businesses, those programs could help lower energy use or improve access to cooling, but the specific projects and recipients would be determined after the measure’s adoption.
The proposal also tests whether a city can raise substantial climate funding through a fee on large corporations without placing the same charge on every business. Supporters say prioritizing low-income communities could direct benefits to residents who face higher energy costs or heat risks. Opponents, including business groups, argue that the fee could be passed on to shoppers through higher prices. The available report does not quantify any likely price effect, so that remains a disputed claim rather than an established outcome.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Portland’s Earlier Corporate Fee
Portland adopted a related clean energy funding approach in 2018. Its fund charges a 1% fee on local sales revenue of the largest corporations, rather than Eugene’s proposed 2% fee on qualifying local profits. A Portland city representative said the fund had collected $1 billion in total by June; the report says it now raises nearly $200 million annually, above an initial estimate of $30 million to $90 million. The source does not give the year for that June figure.
The report attributes Portland’s revenue exceeding projections in part to unexpectedly high online sales. It says the city has issued more than 400 community grants, increased annual renewable generation by over 500 megawatt-hours, reduced nearly 35,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas pollution, and supported training for about 1,500 people. Examples cited include a community solar garden intended to lower bills for 140 low-income households and distribution of more than 24,000 portable air conditioners, mostly heat pumps.
Other cities have created climate funds through different taxes, including utility, sales, property and payroll taxes. The Building Decarbonization Coalition was not aware of another city besides Portland with a clean energy fee specifically on billion-dollar corporations, according to the report. Eugene’s proposal is backed by a coalition of more than 100 organizations, unions, businesses, community leaders and elected officials. The Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce and several business associations oppose it.
““We just don’t have the funds” to switch to electric equipment.”
— Amy Winton, owner of Pandita
electric appliance retrofitting kit
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Revenue and Price Effects Remain Open
The measure has not yet been decided by voters, so the fund is not guaranteed to be created. The source gives an annual revenue projection of $15 million to $37 million but does not explain the assumptions behind that range or establish how much the city would ultimately collect. Portland’s results show that one city’s receipts can exceed forecasts, but its fee uses a different rate and tax base, so those figures cannot confirm Eugene’s likely revenue.
It is also unclear whether covered companies would pass any portion of the fee to customers. Opponents claim prices will rise, while supporters dispute that characterization, but the report provides no independent analysis of consumer impacts. Details such as the final project selection process, the timing of grants and the amount available to specific programs would depend on the measure’s passage and implementation.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
November Vote Sets the Next Step
The next major milestone is Eugene’s November ballot vote. If voters approve the measure, the city would then need to put the fee and fund into operation, including determining how qualifying profits are calculated, collecting payments and setting procedures for allocating proceeds. The source report does not specify an implementation schedule.
If voters reject it, the proposed fund would not proceed under this ballot measure. Until the vote, supporters and opponents are continuing to make their cases: the former emphasize local clean energy investment and community benefits, while the latter warn of potential costs to consumers. The ballot result will establish whether Eugene adopts this funding model, but it will not by itself resolve the longer-term questions about actual revenue or price effects.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What would Eugene voters decide?
Voters will decide whether to create a climate fund financed by a 2% fee on qualifying profits earned within Eugene by companies that meet the measure’s national and local profit thresholds.
Which companies would be subject to the proposed fee?
The proposal covers companies with at least $1 billion in gross profits nationally and at least $500,000 in gross profits within Eugene. The report names major retailers and other large firms as examples, but does not provide a complete list of covered companies.
What would the money fund?
Proposed uses include renewable energy and efficiency programs, clean energy job training, and green infrastructure such as tree planting. The measure would prioritize projects benefiting low-income and historically marginalized communities.
Would the fee make prices go up?
That is disputed. An opposition spokesperson said costs would increase, while supporters challenge that argument. The report provides no independent estimate showing whether, or by how much, companies might pass the fee on to customers.
Has another city tried this approach?
Portland, Oregon, adopted a related corporate clean energy fee in 2018. Its system charges a 1% fee on local sales revenue of large corporations, which differs from Eugene’s proposed fee on qualifying local profits.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
